Ankur Goyal: Production AI Engineering starts with Evals
11 October 2024; 117 minutes
Foundational evaluation and product iteration discussion
Takeaways & episode link →Specialist-model research desk
Choose the conversations that address your next engineering decision.

11 October 2024; 117 minutes
Foundational evaluation and product iteration discussion
Takeaways & episode link →3 August 2026; 101 minutes
Serving configuration, caching, precision and workload trade-offs
Takeaways & episode link →21 September 2026; 141 minutes
Task decomposition, calibration and service primitives
Takeaways & episode link →22 October 2026; 86 minutes
Variable demand versus fixed compute commitments
Takeaways & episode link →20 October 2026; 37 minutes
Delivery constraints behind apparently interchangeable GPU hours
Takeaways & episode link →Publisher pages and selected transcripts underpin the roundup. These conversations are not independent tests of your production system.
Start with evaluation if you cannot define success; start with serving economics if a credible candidate already exists.
The dates/durations come from the linked publisher records below.
Listen/watch: Latent Space episode page with audio, transcript and video link.
Listen/watch: Latent Space episode page with transcript and YouTube link.
Listen: Latent Space episode and transcript.
Listen: Latent Space episode and transcript.
Listen/watch: Latent Space episode page with audio, transcript and video link.
Assign one decision and one output to each participant, rather than asking everyone to consume every episode.
Do not copy historical prices, fundraising totals or model rankings from a recording into a current business case.
Short answers to the questions buyers ask.
Read →11 / REFERENCEEvidence gaps and limits that still need resolving.
Read →12 / REFERENCEThe research’s own quality scores and limitations.
Read →13 / REFERENCETrace the section’s claims to the original sources.
Read →Specific, dated selections with concrete buyer exercises and honest access limits. Strong relevance, but concentrated publisher coverage and no full audiovisual review limit the source score.