Specialist-model research desk

Next steps

Stage 4: does the result justify operational validation?

Frontier Development research deskSection 12 · Page 7 of 12Last updated 26 October 2026

Compare candidates on accepted tasks under the same obligations. Include review, retries, fallback, operating labour and capacity; published infrastructure prices cover only selected inputs.

  • □ The final holdout remained protected throughout development.
  • □ Critical requirements pass, with failures and segment results visible.
  • □ Cost calculations use measured workload and explicitly stated assumptions.
  • □ A downside case covers lower volume, cheaper baseline pricing and more review.
  • □ Required assets can be exported and run in the intended destination.
  • □ The buyer can explain why the result changes the decision.

If the candidate fails a critical requirement, do not rescue it with an attractive average cost. If the outcome is inconclusive, identify the smallest additional test that would resolve the decision; do not automatically enlarge the production scope.

TRACE THE EVIDENCE

Sources cited on this page

  1. published infrastructure prices →www.together.ai