Specialist-model research desk

Readiness quiz

12. Have we reviewed the actual use and processing risks? — HARD GATE

Frontier Development research deskSection 08 · Page 14 of 20Last updated 26 October 2026

A — 0: Data sensitivity, affected people and intended actions are unknown. B — 1: Risks are listed, but approvals, controls or escalation remain unresolved. C — 2: The appropriate reviewers have approved the pilot’s scope and handling, with restrictions and required human checks documented.

Evidence to attach: use-case/data-flow review and control owners. If weak: pause the affected activity. Consequential-decision requirements and health-data processing rules illustrate why this must be specific to the use, not a generic AI checklist.

Question 12 of 12Critical gate

Have we reviewed the actual use and processing risks?

Evidence to show: use-case/data-flow review and control owners.

A desk-designed readiness rubric, not a validated prediction of success. Progress stays in this browser; no answers are sent to the desk.

TRACE THE EVIDENCE

Sources cited on this page

  1. Consequential-decision requirements →leg.colorado.gov
  2. health-data processing rules →www.hhs.gov