Specialist-model research desk

Readiness quiz

6. Can we judge results consistently?

Frontier Development research deskSection 08 · Page 8 of 20Last updated 26 October 2026

A — 0: Success is a subjective demo reaction or an unexplained model score. B — 1: A rubric exists, but human and automated scoring have not been calibrated. C — 2: Deterministic checks and adjudicated human examples define acceptance; any model judge has a documented error review.

Evidence to attach: rubric and grader-calibration record. If weak: start with a small reviewed diagnostic set. Human calibration matters before automated grades influence a procurement decision.

Question 6 of 12

Can we judge results consistently?

Evidence to show: rubric and grader-calibration record.

A desk-designed readiness rubric, not a validated prediction of success. Progress stays in this browser; no answers are sent to the desk.

TRACE THE EVIDENCE

Sources cited on this page

  1. Human calibration →www.anthropic.com